<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to get a forum listed in DMOZ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumdr.com/how-to-get-a-forum-listed-in-dmoz/161/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumdr.com/how-to-get-a-forum-listed-in-dmoz/161/</link>
	<description>Practical Advice for Running an Online Forum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.forumdr.com/how-to-get-a-forum-listed-in-dmoz/161/comment-page-1/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 04:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumdr.com/?p=161#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>A couple of comments:
When you say you have &quot;tried every angle and different catagories&quot;, then that is against DMOZ&#039;s guidelines, so you have been hurting your chance there. See this post in How Not to Get Listed in DMOZ:
http://www.forumdr.com/how-not-to-get-a-site-listed-in-dmoz/393/

DMOZ has nothing to do with Google&#039;s guidelines. There is nothing in DMOZ&#039;s guidelines about an editor not having a site in a category. It is fine as long as they declare in their DMOZ internal system that they have the site and as long as they treat other sites the same as theirs. If a DMOZ editor deliberately does not list a competing site, etc and this can be shown to be the case, then that editor will be removed. DMOZ takes this seriously. Abuse can be reported at: http://report-abuse.dmoz.org/ . However, not reviewing and listing a site within a webmasters expected time frame is not necessarily abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of comments:<br />
When you say you have &#8220;tried every angle and different catagories&#8221;, then that is against DMOZ&#8217;s guidelines, so you have been hurting your chance there. See this post in How Not to Get Listed in DMOZ:<br />
<a href="http://www.forumdr.com/how-not-to-get-a-site-listed-in-dmoz/393/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forumdr.com/how-not-to-get-a-site-listed-in-dmoz/393/</a></p>
<p>DMOZ has nothing to do with Google&#8217;s guidelines. There is nothing in DMOZ&#8217;s guidelines about an editor not having a site in a category. It is fine as long as they declare in their DMOZ internal system that they have the site and as long as they treat other sites the same as theirs. If a DMOZ editor deliberately does not list a competing site, etc and this can be shown to be the case, then that editor will be removed. DMOZ takes this seriously. Abuse can be reported at: <a href="http://report-abuse.dmoz.org/" rel="nofollow">http://report-abuse.dmoz.org/</a> . However, not reviewing and listing a site within a webmasters expected time frame is not necessarily abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.forumdr.com/how-to-get-a-forum-listed-in-dmoz/161/comment-page-1/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumdr.com/?p=161#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>I have tried every angle and different catagories to get listed and still no luck.  I even noticed in one particular catagory:




http://www.dmoz.org/Reference/Education/Colleges_and_Universities/Admissions/Counseling_Services/ that the editor actually owns his own consulting company.  I thought that was agasinst Google guidlines for editors. What hope is there for companies like ours if the editor is a competitor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried every angle and different catagories to get listed and still no luck.  I even noticed in one particular catagory:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dmoz.org/Reference/Education/Colleges_and_Universities/Admissions/Counseling_Services/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dmoz.org/Reference/Education/Colleges_and_Universities/Admissions/Counseling_Services/</a> that the editor actually owns his own consulting company.  I thought that was agasinst Google guidlines for editors. What hope is there for companies like ours if the editor is a competitor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

